The MQ-25 Stingray aerial refueling drone of the Navy, its first fleet-based unmanned refueling aircraft, is going far in the most considerable change in naval aviation for years. Typically, the U.S. aircraft carrier has been the centerpiece of American power projection. Still, it has always been supported by ground-based air operations that carried out vital support tasks such as air refueling. Everything has changed with the MQ-25. The time when uncrewed systems merely serve as support but also revolutionize carrier operations has arrived.

A Historic Aviation Milestone

The MQ-25 hit the headlines in June 2021, when a test aircraft from Boeing successfully transferred fuel during flight to a Navy F/A-18 Super Hornet. The test, conducted over Illinois, was not only a technological achievement—it was a milestone in the way unmanned systems complement crewed platforms. The Super Hornet flew only 20 feet from the unmanned MQ-25, holding station through both dry and wet contacts before taking on board fuel. This wasn’t proof of concept—it was proof of capability in realistic conditions.

More Than a Flying Tanker

Although the MQ-25’s stated purpose is to refuel carrier-based aircraft at range, its effect extends far beyond logistics. Rear Adm. John Meier, Commander of Naval Air Force Atlantic, has described the Stingray as a “revolutionary” move toward creating the Air Wing of the Future. By lifting the refueling load off F/A-18s—historically employed as ad hoc tankers—the Navy can now send more of those aircraft on strike and combat missions. The payoff? More firepower, longer reach, and greater efficiency without more pilots or platforms.

Proven on the Deck, Ready for the Fleet

Getting an unmanned aircraft onto the tightly choreographed deck of a carrier took careful testing. Initially, engineers tested the MQ-25 at Chambers Field in Norfolk by getting it to maneuver within lines painted on mock-ups of carrier decks using remote control. The simulations later led to live demonstrations on board the USS George H.W. Bush, confirming how the MQ-25 could be incorporated into routine deck operations.

A Strategic Building Block

The MQ-25 is not an independent test—it is the Navy’s first step toward creating a networked, hybrid force of manned and unmanned platforms. It is part of the larger movement toward manned-unmanned teaming (MUM-T), in which human pilots and autonomous vehicles work together as integrated teams.

Future success, according to defense analyst Heather Penney of the Mitchell Institute, will not only be based on constructing cutting-edge machines, but on systems where machine and human can understand each other’s strengths and weaknesses. That’s the kind of thinking found in initiatives such as the “Two View Autonomy Framework” that seeks to close the gap between operators and engineers as autonomy becomes more prevalent.

Moving Fast and Learning Faster

Since Boeing won the development contract in 2018, the MQ-25 program has been rapidly moving forward. Within a few years, it not only refueled an F/A-18 but also topped off an F-35C and an E-2D Advanced Hawkeye—showing its versatility throughout the fleet. The Navy has been pushing to get the MQ-25 into operational use as fast as possible, particularly as competitors are building systems intended to counter U.S. carrier superiority in high-threat operations.

A Glimpse Into What’s Next

The deployment of MQ-25s onto Ford- and Nimitz-class carriers will change the way the Navy projects airpower. With its capability to refuel strike aircraft away from the carrier, it enables the U.S. to reach farther without getting closer to enemy defenses. But equally significant, the Stingray opens the door to future unmanned systems—from surveillance drones to autonomous strike aircraft and loyal wingmen designs.

Each lesson gained from the MQ-25—technical, tactical, or procedural—is part of a greater push to transform naval aviation for the battles of the future. In a world defined by speed, precision, and stealth, unmanned vehicles like the MQ-25 won’t be bit players—they’ll be driving the mission.

More related images you may be interested in:

If you are a fan of extreme drama, top-notch technology, and the feeling of being in the middle of one of those Hollywood movies that you already know, then maybe it would be interesting for you to learn about the recent attacks with the American B-2 Spirit stealth bomber on Iran’s nuclear facilities, as they were the perfect combination of these elements.

In the dead of night on June 21, a squadron of B-2s—each a $2 billion marvel of engineering—flew out of Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri. Their target: three of Iran’s most heavily defended nuclear facilities—Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.

This wasn’t business as usual. The B-2s dropped their entire payloads at Fordow before heading back home, all safely. The strike wasn’t merely a military action—it was a massive escalation of the Israel-Iran confrontation, with Washington openly joining in along with its closest Middle East ally to deliver a direct punch to Tehran’s nuclear program.

So what made the B-2 the go-to weapon? For one, it’s the only plane on the planet that can deliver the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP)—a 30,000-pound “bunker buster” intended to smash underground targets once considered beyond reach.

Fordow, which is located inside the mountain, was built to withstand normal bombs. The B-2, however, as having one of the most stealthy radar-dodging flying wing designs, can go beyond the enemy’s protection and deliver the bunker buster in the exact spot.

And although brute power is part of the equation, the B-2’s real advantage is stealth. Its radar cross-section is so small it’s likened to a bird, rendering it nearly invisible to cutting-edge air defense systems.

With a radius of more than 6,000 nautical miles—and even more with in-flight refueling—it can hit anywhere on the planet from its Missouri base.

Its two-person crew depends on advanced automation and concealed weapons bays, allowing it to possess a one-of-a-kind capability of up to 40,000 pounds of bombs while remaining almost invisible.

Preparing such missions is as amazing as the attacks themselves. All 19 B-2s are home-based at Whiteman, but the Pentagon forward-deployed six of them to Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean earlier this year—a deployment that caused a stir when satellite imagery captured the bombers queued up on the runway.

Cedric Leighton, a former Air Force colonel, said the deployment was designed to send several messages to Iran: cease supporting proxies such as the Houthis in Yemen, and realize the repercussions of not coming to the negotiating table regarding nuclear matters.

The B-2’s resume is already filled with combat history. It’s flown missions over Kosovo, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, and now Iran—demonstrating time and again that it can deliver crippling strikes anywhere on the planet, no matter what the defenses. When the B-2 Spirit engages in the battle, it’s an airstrike on steroids—it’s a statement.

Originally, the victors of tank confrontations were mostly decided through brute strength, the vehicles’ thick armor, and their impressive speeds. Over the last century, larger guns, more resilient armor, and quicker engines were essentially what armored battles revolved around, but things have changed on the battlefield. There is a new player in the game who is small, inexpensive, and up in the air. The drones are altering the game by performing their assaults from locations that tank crews can not even imagine. Despite that, armored vehicles still constitute the main power of the ground forces; the latter have a bigger problem with changing their tactics.

Here’s a countdown of the world’s top 10 tanks in active use today, and how each is standing its ground in this new era of aerial threats.

10. T-90 — Russia’s Workhorse

The T-90 marries an upgraded Soviet chassis with new armor and firepower. Its 125mm smoothbore cannon and reactive armor make it deadly against conventional opponents, and its light weight provides acceptable agility. But as recent wars have demonstrated, even a heavily armored T-90 can be defeated by a $1,000 drone with the proper targeting.

9. Type 99 — The Contender

Equipped with a 125mm cannon, composite armor, and computer fire control, the Type 99 is the Chinese response to NATO’s heavyweights. Active protection systems enable it to resist missile attacks and drones, but with UAV technology moving so rapidly, safety requires frequent upgrades.

8. Leclerc — France’s Digital Brawler

France’s Leclerc carries a 120mm smoothbore gun, modifiable armor, and a very high rate of fire. Its advanced electronics enable rapid target pickup, but as with all tanks of this type, its initial designers never expected a battlefield swarming with weaponized quadcopters.

7. K2 Black Panther — South Korea’s Tech Tank

The K2 is among the world’s most advanced tanks. Its 120mm gun, sensor technology, and networked systems are combined with active protection that’s designed to combat drones as well as missiles. Agile enough to complement its firepower, the K2 is built for today’s drone-heavy battlefield.

6. Type 90 — Japan’s Agile Striker

Japan’s Type 90 was designed to be fast and accurate. Its 120mm cannon and high-powered engine provide it with superior agility, and its computer systems improve crew effectiveness. Even this agile platform, however, needs to continue to adapt to remain superior to hordes of FPV drones.

5. Merkava Mk 4 — Israel’s Fortress on Tracks

The Merkava Mk 4 reverses the conventional tank design by placing its engine at the front, protecting the crew. Its 120mm cannon, modular armor, and advanced active protection are specifically designed for asymmetrical battlefields where drones pose a daily threat.

4. Challenger 2 — Britain’s Heavy Hitter

Renowned for its strength and precision, Challenger 2 has a 120mm rifled gun and heavy armor. It’s been upgraded with improved sensors and anti-drone technology, but increased use of UAVs is compelling even this battle-hardened veteran to change.

3. Leopard 2 — Germany’s Balanced Champion

Usually referred to as the world’s greatest all-around tank, the Leopard 2 provides a combination of pace, firepower, and protection that few can equal. Its 120mm smoothbore, powerful engine, and reliable design have made it a NATO darling. Now, new electronic warfare systems and active defenses are keeping it in the running against drones.

2. T-14 Armata — Russia’s Next-Gen Gamble

With an unmanned turret, 125mm gun, and heavy armor, the T-14 Armata is a daring advance in tank technology. Its sensors and battlefield networking are designed to counter both conventional and drone dangers, but its absence of a tested combat record leaves some things to guesswork.

1. M1 Abrams — The American Benchmark

The M1 Abrams has been the gold standard for decades. Equipped with a 120mm smoothbore gun, composite armor, and a steady stream of upgrades, it is still a force to be reckoned with. Newer variants are receiving top-of-the-line active protection and advanced sensors to deal with drones, so the Abrams is not losing its crown yet.

The Drone Factor

The conflict in Ukraine has demonstrated how much of a disruption drones can cause, sometimes only costing hundreds of dollars, but able to incapacitate million-dollar tanks. FPV drones, loitering munitions, and AI-controlled UAVs are turning the tables, compelling tank crews to reorganize or face annihilation at the hands of drones. Electronic warfare may be able to jam certain drones, but AI-controlled models can fly signal-free, rendering jamming futile. It’s an arms race where evolution means survival.

Lessons of the Past

Legends such as the Tiger I, T-34, and Sherman M4 continue to influence the design of tanks today. The sloping armor of the T-34 changed survivability forever, while the Tiger I established new levels of firepower. These lessons of balance, versatility, and protection remain the foundational principles for tanks today.

Rolling Into the Future

Tanks no longer battle only other tanks. Their foes now fly, swarm, and think. The greatest tanks in the world will be those that remain connected, remain armored, and remain mobile—whatever the battlefield becomes.

On July 18, 2025, the atmosphere above Minot, North Dakota, transformed into an aerial display of a dramatic and disturbing chapter in the history of American air travel. Following an impressive overflight at the North Dakota State Fair, a U.S. Air Force B-52 bomber was chasing a commercial airliner and a small private plane so closely that it nearly collided with them. This incident has turned into a reference point for discussions about the intricacies and vulnerabilities of the coexistence of the military and civil aviation sectors, especially in the vicinity of less-trafficked airports.

A B-52 based at Minot Air Force Base was wrapping up its officially authorized overflight when it went off track and started its landing approach at Minot International Airport, which triggered the incident. At that time, SkyWest Airlines Flight 3788, operating as a Delta Connection from Minneapolis, was on final approach with 76 passengers and four crew members.

The National Transportation Safety Board report – at its initial stage – states that the B-52 was on its briefed flight plan and was coordinated in advance with Minot Air Traffic Control as well as Dakota Radar Approach Control. The air traffic controller who was on duty, however, did not suggest to the B-52 crew that a commercial jet was inbound, nor did he warn the pilot of the airliner of the bomber’s whereabouts.

Just at that moment when the two aircraft locations were about to overlap, the SkyWest pilot suddenly saw the massive bomber coming up on his right side. Since he was given no warning, he did what he called later “an aggressive maneuver” to avoid a crash, in which he wrenched the regional jet into a quick turn that not only pushed him into their seat but also looked at the ground instead of the sky. Monica Green, a passenger seated near the front, remembered the quietness and uneasiness that gripped the plane as it made the steep bank and everyone realized in silence that something was not right. The pilot, letting his nervousness be heard, apologized to the passengers after landing, saying it was a surprise for him when it happened, and he did not receive any prior warning from air traffic control. 

The drama was not over with a near miss of a commercial jet. The B-52 came close to crashing with a light aircraft, a privately operated Piper PA-28-151, which was also flying around the airport under visual flight rules, less than a minute after the near-miss with the commercial jet. The detail that the bomber came within one-third of a mile of the Piper is only in the NTSB’s preliminary findings. Once again, the controller did not tell the crew on the B-52 that there was a smaller plane in the area.

The NTSB report describes a tower in Minot where both confusion and a breakdown in procedures were evident. As things stood, there was only one controller on duty, and he was in charge of visually managing all traffic because there was no radar; as a result, the work quickly went beyond his capacity.

Looking at transcripts of radio communications, it is clear that the controller had issued several confusing or delayed commands, and in one instance, had even to reverse the instructions because he had confused call signs. The local controller was also in charge of communicating with a regional FAA radar controller from Rapid City, South Dakota, before he could give out any instructions, and this procedure might have been the reason for the delays that occurred.

Jeff Guzzetti, an aviation safety consultant who has worked on the NTSB and FAA investigation cases, was very clear that the controller did not warn the Delta and Piper pilots early enough to turn the aircraft off and thus be able to keep a safe distance from the bomber. He added that the occurrence of three aircraft meeting each other at the very same time, combined with the unavailability of radar and the need for external coordination, escalated the situation quickly.

However, wonderfully, the three aircraft managed to land without any problems, and no one was injured. The NTSB’s initial report did not point fingers, but only stated that the B-52 was functioning within its limits and that the visual separation standard was followed by both the bomber and the Piper. Meanwhile, the Air Force stressed that it remains committed to safety and will cooperate fully with the ongoing investigations, as was also confirmed by the FAA, which has already set up its own inquiry, commenting that Minot’s tower is run by private contractors and not by the agency’s staff.

This is an incident that occurred amidst the implementation of military and civilian airspace coordination strategies, which have been under increased focus after several accidents and close calls that have been reported in recent years.

The Minot event shows how airports with no radar, and particularly smaller ones, are handling the situation under the still present military operations that have now been overlapped with commercial and private aviation, and thus are facing the challenges of such a convergence. While the NTSB and FAA are conducting their investigations, aviation is still struggling with how to prevent this from happening again as the skies get more and more crowded, especially in those areas where the risk is the highest and there is very little room for error.

The Sukhoi Su-57 Felon was the Russian initiative to create an excellent stealth fighter of the fifth generation – a single that consisted of a lot of advanced technology that would have taken Russian aerospace back to the front of the news and been able to rival the USA’s top and smartest fighter aircraft, such as the F-22 and F-35. Nevertheless, the plane has not been going well for a long time. Instead of achieving fantastic success, the Su-57 has hit the problems of delays, production issues, and ambiguities about its role in the changing military sphere.

The Su-57 project was started as early as the 2000s under the PAK FA program. It was to create a multi-role fighter that would dominate the air, attack targets on the ground, and perform reconnaissance. It featured stealth technology, a lot of lightweight composite materials, hidden armament bays, and cutting-edge avionics.

The plane was designed to be incredibly maneuverable in the air, with smart systems onboard — some went so far as calling the flight computer an “electronic co-pilot” — and radar spread all across the airframe to watch out for threats coming in from all angles.

Artificial intelligence was built into its communication and data systems so that pilots could get ahead of their competition and make fast decisions under difficult conditions. Russia’s state producers asserted that the technology made it possible for the plane to send encrypted information at high rates, helping to increase reconnaissance and combat effectiveness.

On paper, the Su-57 is impressive. It has a top speed of twice the speed of sound, a range of over 2,000 miles, and can accommodate hypersonic missiles and precise smart weapons. Its sensors can track multiple targets at once, and its artificial intelligence can learn from mission results to be a more effective tactician and help maintain the plane out of harm’s way. Its slender, angled shape with radar-absorbing materials and engines concealed within is intended to make it invisible to enemy radar, especially head-on.

But in reality, it has not been smooth sailing. Sanctions from the West have bitten Russia, keeping it from accessing key components like cutting-edge electronics and special materials employed in order to attain stealth. The Su-57’s radar, which was initially built based on German technology, is most affected. Efforts to replace these components with imports from other countries have not been straightforward, and there is doubt about the availability of these alternatives.

Because of these problems, very few Su-57s are operational. By late 2024, only about 22 had been delivered, including test and production models. Official targets for attaining higher numbers in subsequent years now seem unrealistic. Every Su-57 is a treasure — when one of them was hit in an attack in the Astrakhan region, it was losing an expensive part of Russia’s cutting-edge fighter capability. Replacing these planes is time-consuming and expensive, with limited spares, while Russia churns out more proven aircraft like the Su-30SM2 and Su-35S to fill gaps.

In action, the Su-57 has had a limited role in the war in Ukraine. Russia has been cautious about risking its precious few jets in contested airspace, not wanting to lose expensive, advanced technology and damage the jet’s global reputation. That self-restraint has meant the Su-57 has had little impact so far. Instead, Russia employs upgraded older jets, which may not be as advanced but are abundant and less expensive to repair.

Or vice versa, they have had to wait a considerable time before starting to export to foreign countries. Algeria is the first customer to buy six Su-57E fighter aircraft. Besides that, the pilots are training in Russia, and they’re talking about making more purchases. In part, it is a matter of doing what others in the region who have the most modern fighters are doing. Nevertheless, this order is the only one, and no big sales are expected. In 2018, India, which had originally intended to co-design a fighter jet with Russia, decided to withdraw, being dissatisfied with the stealth and electronic features of the Su-57. Few people can help but feel sympathetic towards the bad-boy reputation the aircraft got from the times it displayed its glaring weaknesses at airshows and from ongoing quality issues in the manufacturing. 

One of the contrasts between the Western competitors and the Russian fighter is the severity and visibility of the different issues with the Su-57. Just to name only one example, the U.S. already produces over a thousand F-35s globally at various locations, all controlled by a massive supply chain and quality assurance regime. While the F-22 and F-35 are the stealth/sensor tech standards of gold with histories of success in modern warfare and very stable flight, Russian planes, although said to be able to cancel out Western air defense, are still considered by most experts as far from being perfect in the stealth area.

Nevertheless, the Kremlin still regards the Su-57 as central to Russia’s military strategy over the long haul. The Kremlin interprets the Su-57 as a national pride masterpiece and a way to keep pace with other powers of similar calibre. However, as the sanctions proceed and with all the production difficulties, the Su-57 is more of a prestige program than a front-line game changer. The global arms market is watching, but for now, Russia’s leading-edge fighter is having trouble flying on the runway and worldwide.

The development of the aviation industry during the Second World War was a major transformation with the most rapid change in technology. Since all the factions in the war were trying to dominate the sky, the engineers were creating the craziest, weirdest, and strangely productive aeronautics that were not previously known. They even surpassed the limits of human capabilities with these machines and, in some instances, were beyond quite a few people’s perception of madness. Here were the ten most amazing and weird planes, and above all, ships with their own independent stories of ambition and genius.

10. Martin PBM-5A Mariner

The PBM-5A Mariner was one of America’s most powerful patrol bombers, even beating the legendary PBY Catalina at several tasks. Designed by the Glenn L. Martin Company, it boasted a gull wing that left its engines above the spray of salt, and retractable wing floats to cut drag. Its bomb bay lay hidden in the fuselage, so it could fly more quickly when weighed down with bombs. Subsequent versions were even equipped with jet-assisted take-off rockets for short, high-angle climbs—ideal for rescue missions in choppy seas. Staffed by nine and equipped with several .50-caliber cannons, the Mariner paid its dues in the Battle of the Atlantic by sinking ten German submarines. Of the over a thousand that were built, just one survives today.

9. Curtiss XP-55 Ascender

The XP-55 Ascender resembled something out of a science fiction strip—its engine was mounted behind the pilot, it featured a canard wing at the front, and dual vertical tails mounted at the end of its wings. The unorthodox “pusher” design was supposed to provide improved visibility and concentrate firepower in the nose. Unfortunately, it had unpredictable stalls and never produced the desired performance. Three were constructed, and two were destroyed in crashes. The one that remains is a testament to how far engineers would push things to experiment.

8. Vought V-173 “Flying Pancake”

The bizarrely endearing V-173 became known by its nickname due to its body being round and flat and its massive propellers—over sixteen feet in diameter each. Conceived by Charles Zimmerman, the plane was able to lift off over an extremely short distance, and with a powerful headwind, it could nearly fly vertically. Its peculiar shape created lift over its entire surface, which provided helicopter-like maneuverability in flight. Although testing was successful, the Navy’s interest was already turned toward more speed-oriented jet aircraft, and the Flying Pancake never entered production.

7. Focke-Wulf 190D “Long Nose”

Designated as the “Langnasen” to German airmen, the Focke-Wulf 190D was an interception-capable high-altitude fighter equipped with a liquid-cooled Jumo 213 engine. Its top speed was raised to approximately 440 mph with this improvement and enabled it to engage Allied bombers at altitude. Equipped with 20mm and 13mm cannons, it was a formidable foe, but wartime production interruptions meant that it was never produced in the quantities that could have made the difference. Now, only a few remain on display in museums. 

6. Nakajima Ki-43 Hayabusa (“Oscar”)

The Ki-43 Hayabusa, or “Peregrine Falcon,” was a long-legged and quick-flying fighter that surprised Allied pilots at the beginning of the war. Highly agile, it was one of Japan’s most ubiquitous fighters, with over 5,900 produced. Early models had no armor or self-sealing fuel tanks, but subsequent improvements corrected those limitations without destroying the plane’s legendary agility. There is only one complete example of the type preserved.

5. Mitsubishi A6M7 Reisen (Zero)

The Mitsubishi Zero was legendary enough for its speed and maneuverability, but the A6M7 model added even more capabilities. It was built for dive-bombing from smaller carriers with strengthened wings and bomb racks instead of a centerline fuel tank. This model was one of the last Zeros to fly, as the war went against the Japanese. Although more than ten thousand Zeros were produced in total, relatively few intact aircraft remain in original condition today.

4. Horten Ho 229

The Ho 229 was in a class by itself—a streamlined jet-propelled flying wing decades ahead of its time. Its unconventional shape cut both drag and radar signature, and its twin jet motors promised up to 600 mph speeds. The aircraft took to the air in prototype in 1944, but the war’s end came before it could go into production. Still, it was one of the most sophisticated ideas to come out of the war.

3. Messerschmitt Me 262

The Me 262 was the first operational jet fighter in the world, and when it emerged, it startled Allied pilots. It had a top speed of around 540 mph and nose-mounted heavy cannons, and could tear through bomber formations before the bombers had time to respond. Reliability and fuel shortages held it back from altering the war, but its design left a gigantic mark on postwar aircraft development.

2. Heinkel He 178 and He 280

The Heinkel He 178 is the first jet plane to have ever flown, which it did in 1939. Following on from this achievement, Heinkel produced the He 280, the first purpose-built turbojet fighter. With a top speed of in excess of 550 mph, the He 280 was a leading contender, but rival designs—such as the Me 262—got to production first. Nevertheless, these initial jets represented the beginning of a new age for flight.

1. Mitsubishi J8M1 Shusui / Ki-200

The number one position is held by the Mitsubishi J8M1 Shusui, a rocket-powered interceptor designed with Germany’s Me 163 Komet as its model. Developed to combat bombers at high altitudes, it was able to ascend to breathtaking heights in just minutes and achieve scorching speeds—but for only five minutes, as the fuel would then be depleted. Technical information from Germany came in pieces, so Japanese engineers had to improvise much of the development. Unfortunately, the prototype crashed during its initial test flight, and it killed the test pilot. The war broke out before the aircraft were further developed.

These planes are a testament to the daring experiments and risky leaps in technology that characterized WWII aviation. Some of them were breakthroughs, some failures, but all left their unique imprint on the history of aviation.