Speed is not something that the fighter jets brag about; rather, it can be the difference between a win and a loss for your side in a fight. It is a matter of pride for pilots and designers, a technical challenge, and a tactical advantage. However, in an environment where stealth and sensors may have more weight than force, what are the fastest planes that still hold the kingship of speed? How about starting from the tenth fastest fighter jet to the first and counting down the twelve fastest aircraft in the world?

10. McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II

A Cold War legend, the F-4 Phantom II continues to serve with Turkish, Greek, and Iranian air forces. With its twin General Electric J79 engines, it could make Mach 2.23 at 40,000 feet. Its design wasn’t precisely streamlined, which earned it the quip, “A brick can fly if you put a big enough engine on it.” Early models didn’t even come equipped with a built-in gun—missiles were supposed to render dogfighting obsolete—until combat experience demonstrated otherwise, and a gun pod was added.

9. Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor

The F-22 is the sole stealth aircraft in this roster and the first true fifth-generation fighter. With a top speed of 2.25 Mach at 40,000 feet, it’s also a supercruiser—able to sustain speeds over Mach 1.8 without afterburners. That translates to more range, less fuel consumption, and no external stores to drag it down. Though highly capable, fewer than 200 were produced, and only the U.S. Air Force operates them.

8. IAI Kfir

Israel’s IAI Kfir is a hot-rodded version of the Mirage 5 with an American General Electric J79-J1E turbojet. It flies at up to about Mach 2.3 at 36,000 feet. Aging airframes might not reach that number these days, but their combination of agility and speed has kept them in service in Colombia and among private military contractors for training and aggressor missions.

7. Mikoyan MiG-29 Fulcrum

The MiG-29 was designed as a smaller, more maneuverable partner to the Su-27 and as an answer to the F-16. With a Mach 2.3 top speed, it’s renowned for its handling—aided by its twin engines and short airframe. Its drawback? Short range, and it can’t go supersonic with outside fuel tanks. As pilots like to say, when it comes to a dogfight, it’s as much about the driver as the vehicle itself.

6. Grumman F-14 Tomcat

The Navy’s iconic F-14 Tomcat, which had variable-sweep wings, could reach Mach 2.3 at 40,000 feet. With the mighty AWG-9 radar and AIM-54 Phoenix missiles, it could lock onto aircraft as far away as 90 miles. Pilots remember that a lightly loaded, clean F-14 could fly even faster than its official rating indicated—though its carrier deck-dominating days are behind it.

5. Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-23 Flogger

Another swing-wing design, the MiG-23 was constructed as a high-speed interceptor. Priced to fly at Mach 2.35, it had advanced radar and long-range targeting available for its era. Less agile than more contemporary designs, its short runway launch capability provided it with Cold War strategic flexibility.

4. Sukhoi Su-27 Flanker

One of the finest Soviet combatants, the Su-27 has a top speed of Mach 2.35. It was designed for power and payload as well as speed, and its airframe has led to an entire family of variants, such as the Su-30, Su-34, and Su-35.

More than 1,200 Flankers remain in service around the globe; it is one of the most ubiquitous fighter designs in use.

3. McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle

Designed to replace the MiG-25, the F-15 was the fastest mass-produced fighter to date, reaching Mach 2.5. It also has a perfect combat record—more than 100 kills with no air-to-air loss. The new F-15EX can theoretically hit Mach 2.9, although that speed hasn’t been tried in public. 

2. Mikoyan MiG-31 Foxhound

A direct follow-up to the MiG-25, the MiG-31 has a top speed of Mach 2.83 at high altitude, though speed limits keep it at around Mach 1.5 to avoid destruction. It’s not only fast—its sophisticated radar, long-range missiles, and hypersonic weapon capacity make it one of the most lethal interceptors in the skies.

1. Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 Foxbat

Even still, the speed record holder for any fighter ever produced, the MiG-25 can reach Mach 2.83—and higher in short-term bursts—at more than 70,000 feet.

The product of late ’60s development to intercept high-speed bombers and reconnaissance planes, it prompted the creation of the F-15 by the U.S. Its very high speed, however, sacrificed maneuverability, but for pure velocity, nothing else has come close.

Why Aren’t Fighters Getting Faster?

Almost all of the world’s fastest jets were created during the Cold War. Current fighters only break Mach 1.2 in real combat because contemporary air warfare favors stealth, sophisticated sensors, and long-range missiles over pure speed.

Interceptor missions do continue to gain from high speeds, but after some point, speed confers little benefit while burning fuel and stressing airframes. Even sixth-generation concepts will have a top speed between Mach 2.2 and Mach 2.5. In other words, they don’t build speed demons like they used to—by choice.

By employing these long-range, precision-guided missiles, Kyiv can hit locations that are far away from the front lines—targets of the Russian military that are not only attacked in the areas of Ukraine that have been occupied, but also, for the very first time, those that are deep inside Russia.

Washington’s approval of the strikes on Russian territory represented a dramatic policy change. In most of the conflicts, U.S. policymakers abstained from this move, apprehensive that such strikes might lead to risky escalation.

That equation changed after news emerged of North Korean soldiers fighting in conjunction with Russian forces in the Kursk province and amid increasing doubt regarding whether future American political power would continue to provide military support to Kyiv. As the BBC reported, the move was widely seen as aimed at bolstering Ukraine’s position before any potential shift in US policy.

Ukraine did not delay in testing its new range. Its initial confirmed ATACMS attack within Russia struck a missile storage facility near Karachev in the Bryansk province—about 70 miles from the border. The explosion obliterated huge caches of artillery shells, anti-aircraft missiles, and other ordnance, with drones said to have assisted the mission. Russia said most of the missiles were shot down, but video evidence indicated the facility took serious damage.

The attacks didn’t end there. Ukrainian troops subsequently struck Russian military targets in the Kursk region, including a battalion of S-400 surface-to-air missiles around Lotarevka—Russia’s most sophisticated air defense system and its response to the U.S. Patriot.

The Russian Defense Ministry acknowledged that two out of five incoming missiles penetrated the defenses, destroying a radar and causing casualties. Another attack was made on the Khalino air base, although Moscow played down the extent of the damage. For the Kremlin to publicly acknowledge any losses at all is unusual—and telling.

In Crimea, ATACMS have been equally disconcerting. A minimum of ten were employed to strike S-300 and S-400 sites throughout the peninsula, destroying or knocking out systems and killing operators. Independent satellite imagery verified the damage, including at the strategically significant node of Dzhankoy. The strikes compelled Russia to relocate its air defenses further from the front line, making it more difficult to resupply them and leaving some less defended.

Russia’s reply has been both verbal and artillery. On the ground, it has heightened missile and drone strikes against Ukrainian cities, targeting energy infrastructure—a campaign Amnesty International has dubbed a war crime for deliberately targeting civilian essentials.

Politically, the Kremlin has cranked up its nuclear threats. Spokesman Dmitry Peskov cautioned that NATO-supplied missile attacks on Russian soil might qualify under Moscow’s new doctrine as nuclear retaliation targets, which now include attacks by non-nuclear nations supported by nuclear powers.

Militarily, their use has undermined the feeling of those in Russia that everything will be alright. Within 300 kilometers range, what used to be “safe” haunts-airfields, command centers, supply depots-are at your fingertips now.

Moscow has reacted by redistributing the equipment, moving the planes deep inside their territory, and installing more air defenses. The war in Ukraine is raging with ATACMS turning the tide: they are cutting the enemy off from their supply routes, making their defensive lines weaker, and raising morale, which is very important at such a period of hard fighting in the east.

Still, some Western analysts caution against overrating the missiles' role. Firstly, the ATACMS supply to Ukraine is limited. Secondly, the Russian command is already adapting its tactics to the changed situation. Apart from that, missiles alone will not be able to end the war; also, changes in U.S. politics may affect future deliveries.

Despite that, their deployment has redefined the limits of this war. The introduction of ATACMS demonstrated how a single change in military policy can remake strategy, change calculations of risk, and introduce new unpredictability into a conflict already anything but predictable.

The last years of World War II were a period when the advancement of a new kind of aerial warfare was taken to a level never reached before. The two opposing war blocs in which the war was fought were engaged in a race to be the first to develop a jet engine—an innovation that promised to bring higher speeds, faster climbs, and new tactical possibilities. Several such planes became the talk of the town; some later faded into oblivion. Anyway, they all contributed to the history of flight.

5. Nakajima Kikka – Japan’s Audacious Jet Experiment

Japan made its jump into the jet age at the end of the war with the Nakajima Kikka. Based in part on the German Messerschmitt Me 262, this two-engine aircraft was intended to be carrier-capable, simple to manufacture, and even achievable by semi-skilled workers. Directed by Kenichi Matsumura and Kazuo Ohno, the plane was fitted with folding wings for storage on carriers and two Ishikawajima Ne-20 axial-flow turbojets powering it, each with 1,047 pounds of thrust.

These engines were reverse-engineered from photographs of the German BMW 003, so the fact that they did exist is a testament to ingenuity in the face of draconian wartime austerity. Provision for armament was for either a 500 kg or 800 kg bomb for the standard version, with subsequent versions to carry dual 30 mm Type 5 cannons.

The Kikka made its maiden flight on August 7, 1945, days before the Japanese surrender. Just one prototype ever flew; several others remained incomplete. Developmental engine challenges, diminishing resources, and the failure of Japan’s manufacturing infrastructure sealed the program’s fate. Although it never engaged in combat, the Kikka shattered the myth of Japan simply copying other nations’ designs, instead demonstrating its engineers were capable of innovation in the face of extreme adversity.

4. Heinkel He 280 – The First Jet Fighter

Before the Me 262 gained its notoriety, the Heinkel He 280 was the world’s first jet fighter to fly and was introduced in September 1940. This double-engine aircraft was capable of reaching approximately 500 mph and was the first plane in the world to incorporate an ejector seat—a feature that would prevent many pilot fatalities in the years to come.

Although promising, the He 280 fell behind the Me 262 in production priority. It never made it to full service, but it demonstrated that jet fighters were not only feasible but could be at least competitive with piston-engine aircraft in performance.

3. Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star – America’s First Jet Fighter

America entered the jet age with the Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star in 1944. British-built turbojet engines were employed in the initial prototypes, and by the last weeks of the war, two working P-80s were shipped off to Italy, only to be destroyed in non-combat crashes.

Though it missed World War II action, the Shooting Star continued to fight in the Korean War. There, it was soon eclipsed by the Soviet-built MiG-15, which led the U.S. to introduce the faster, more advanced F-86 Sabre. Regardless, the P-80 represented America’s important initial step into jet-fueled air combat.

2. Gloster Meteor – The Allied Jet That Made It to the Fight

Britain’s Gloster Meteor went into service in July 1944, with the distinction of being the sole Allied jet to fight in WWII. It was mostly used to pursue German V1 flying bombs, successfully destroying many of them, albeit with the more agile V2 rockets still beyond its reach.

Almost 4,000 Meteors were ultimately constructed, and although it wasn’t the fastest airplane of its time, it became known for dependability and consistent performance. Its longevity is a testament to its durability—two Meteors remain in service with Martin-Baker as ejection seat testbeds.

1. Messerschmitt Me 262 – The Game-Changer That Arrived Too Late

At the pinnacle is the Messerschmitt Me 262, the world’s first production jet fighter. It arrived in April 1944, and it was faster and better armed than anything the Allies had to fly—its speed 540 mph, its armament deadly. More than 1,430 were produced, and under the right conditions, the Me 262 could outrun even the legendary P-51 Mustang.

But its fighting record was lackluster. Intermittent fuel shortages, novice pilots, and Allied bombing of air bases resulted in many Me 262s being destroyed on the ground. Germany’s war machine was crumbling, and the jet’s potential went untapped.

A Legacy Forged in Urgency

From Japan’s makeshift Nakajima Kikka to Germany’s innovative Me 262, these planes mirror an era in which war created a demand for innovation at breakneck speed. Each was influenced by the demands of war, each was limited in some way, and each pushed the technology that would dominate the skies for decades to come.

More related images you may be interested in:

Today’s battle is fast, confusing, and brutal—most of the time, winning requires a mix of one’s adaptability, correct application of the strategies, and the overwhelming use of firepower. Very few armaments have managed to be efficient through such a transformation in the way wars were fought, as the Carl-Gustaf recoilless rifle did. The company calls the newest version of the weapon the M4, which marries the long history of reliability of the former models with modern upgrades and features. This is still one of the most flexible anti-tank and multi-role systems that are available.

From Post-War Experiment to Global Favorite

The Carl-Gustaf’s history goes back to 1948, when Swedish engineers aimed to design something better than the WWII Panzerschreck and bazooka. The outcome was an 84mm recoilless rifle to destroy tanks and bunkered positions.

Over time, the gun was improved—M1 and M2 saw incremental upgrades, but the M3 sacrificed weight with carbon fiber and aluminum. Yet the M4 saw a revolution, turning it into a whole lot more than an anti-tank weapon. 

Lighter, Faster, Soldier-Friendly

Tip the scales at less than 7 kilograms and a length of less than a meter, the M4 is designed for mobility. Saab’s utilization of titanium and carbon fiber makes it simple to transport on congested urban roads or over vast expanses of open ground. Ergonomics were top-of-mind features—elements such as an adjustable shoulder rest, forward grip, and even a built-in shot counter illustrate the extent to which attention was focused on soldier-friendliness.

Adding Brains to the Brawn

The M4 is not merely a matter of pure firepower—it’s intelligent, too. It can be equipped with anything from simple scopes to sophisticated fire-control systems such as the FCD 558. Due to Saab’s Firebolt protocol, the weapon and ammunition “communicate” with each other, exchanging information such as the type of ammo and temperature to allow real-time ballistic compensation. The result? Improved first-shot hit probability and less for the mind.

Ammunition for Every Mission

Part of why Carl-Gustaf is still invaluable is that it has an enormous amount of ammunition. The 84mm family encompasses everything from bunker-busting and anti-tank rounds to smoke, illumination, and airburst rounds. The new HE 448 warhead employs tungsten pellets for increased armor penetration, the HEAT 655 CS can be fired in tight spaces without harm, and the HEAT 751 tandem warhead penetrates reactive armor. Saab and Raytheon have also tested a laser-guided round able to strike moving targets at a distance of 2 km.

Combat-Proven

The M4’s reputation isn’t hype—it’s real. In Ukraine, it’s been used to blow up Russian T-90M tanks, allegedly giving it the nickname “Slayer of Russian tanks.” The British Army has returned it to service to augment systems shipped off to Ukraine, complimenting it on its adaptability. In America, it’s the M3A1 Multi-purpose Anti-Armor Anti-personnel Weapon System for the Army and Marines.

Training for the Future

For the purpose of providing the necessary training to soldiers while also ensuring that the limitless use of real rounds does not exhaust the budget, Saab came up with an advanced and complicated simulator that imitates the recoil and the ballistic behavior. Other than that, the simulator also records the accuracy, damage, and the reaction time, and thus it allows the soldiers to practice not only shooting but also their decision-making skills to be improved.

A Truly Global Player

Over 40 nations employ the Carl-Gustaf today, such as Australia, Japan, Poland, and the Baltic nations. Saab has even established local production in some areas to fulfill demand. Even better, the M4 is also compatible with the older ammunition, enabling armies to take it up without discarding current stockpiles.

Constructed for the Next Ten Years and Beyond

Saab’s plans to develop the Carl-Gustaf extend beyond 2030, to make it lighter, smarter, and more lethal. Future configurations will be tasked with defeating everything from drones to defended urban strongpoints.

The M4 demonstrates that if appropriately upgraded, even a gun whose ancestry dates back to the 1940s can be a force to be reckoned with on today’s—and tomorrow’s—battlefields.

More related images you may be interested in: