Essentially, the Navy was looking to the A-12 Avenger II to be their next generation, a stealthy, enigmatic, carrier-launched attack aircraft that could go around all sorts of anti-measures and still hit the enemy’s land hard. By the late ’80s, the A-6 Intruder, which had been the Navy’s loyal friend for quite a long time, was getting old, and the increasingly dangerous threats from the Cold War period were asking for a fighter that could survive a radar-guided missile and a tightly integrated air defense system kind of world.

That challenge spawned the Advanced Tactical Aircraft (ATA) program. The mission: create a next-generation carrier-capable stealth attack aircraft.

The Air Force had already amazed the world with the F-117 Nighthawk, and the Navy desired its ace of stealth. In 1988, McDonnell Douglas and General Dynamics were given the contract, and the A-12 Avenger II idea took to the skies, at least on paper.

The shape stood out as sharp and daring: a triangle-like wing they called “Flying Dorito.” It held weapons inside to stay off radar, was made with new, strong materials, and had paint that hid it from radar. Inside were two crew members, a top new flight tech, ground-reading radar, and war electronics gear. It could fight far out, over 900 sea miles away, much more than what came before it.

But translating that promise into a functional aircraft turned out to be much more difficult than anticipated. Combining stealth needs with the special stresses of carrier takeoffs and landings turned into a serious engineering problem. The weight of the plane ballooned beyond early estimates, threatening to make it unsafe for carrier use. Experimental materials and production methods added more delays and technical nuisances.

The secrecy of the program did not aid it. As a secret “black” project, it was exempt from usual oversight, so Congress and the Pentagon were not fully aware of the extent of the problems. The contractors, wanting to maintain confidence at high levels, minimized problems. Navy officials, not wanting to risk killing the program, did the same.

Its costs skyrocketed. The initial $4.8 billion development cost ballooned to close to $11 billion with an eye-popping estimated cost of more than $165 million per plane. In early 1991, the A-12 was behind schedule by 18 months, billions of dollars over budget, and still not flight-ready.

Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney eventually canceled it in January of that year, bringing to an end what proved to be the largest Pentagon contract cancellation in history. The sole A-12 ever to exist was a full-scale mockup.

The end was a mess. For more than 20 years, a big fight went on in court between the state and the builders until it finished in 2014.

The Navy, now without the A-6, had to use the F/A-18 Hornet and later the Super Hornet to do the job. It took a while, but the stealth F-35C finally showed up on ship decks. Yet, it was not the bomber A-12 was meant to be.

Now, the A-12 Avenger II stands as a big warning in U.S. military flight tales. It showed the risks of pushing too far with new tech, handling hard tasks incorrectly, and hiding too much.

Although the “Flying Dorito” was never airborne, its story has changed the way the Pentagon supervises the development of large weapons projects, leading to tighter regulations and more realistic targets before investing in a new cutting-edge aircraft.

More related images you may be interested in:

One of the very limited number of recent air-to-air comparisons that incite a heated brawl is the battle of the F-22 Raptor with the European Eurofighter Typhoon. In fact, these are the two top-of-the-line fighters that represent the most sophisticated technological achievements of the USA and Europe, respectively. Yet the fact remains that it is not as straightforward as the media attempts to portray by just telling us which one is superior. The designs, mission profiles, and high-altitude capabilities of both aircraft were compared, and it took much longer to surface the differences.

Essentially, these planes speak to very different philosophies regarding how to engage in combat. Lockheed Martin’s F-22, which was introduced late in the 1990s, was designed as an air-superiority fighter built with stealth in mind. It wasn’t about scoring points against the opposition—it was about being unseen until it counted. With its stealthy airframe, supercruise ability, thrust-vectoring engines, and leading-edge avionics, the Raptor represents a first-strike, information-driven approach to thinking about modern aerial warfare.

The Eurofighter Typhoon, in contrast, followed a different path. Entering service operation in 2003 after decades of multinational co-development, the Typhoon is all about speed, maneuverability, and multi-role capability. Its delta-canard wing and narrow structure make it extremely responsive. Not as stealthy in all ways as the F-22, it uses radar-absorbent paints and has a relatively low radar cross-section for a fourth-generation fighter. One of the standout features of the Raptor is its P.I.R.A.T.E. infrared search and track (IRST) system, which can detect heat signatures—yes, even those of planes designed to be low-observable.

Performance-wise, each aircraft performs best in its niche. The F-22’s thrust-vectoring allows for stunning maneuvers and razor-sharp turns. The Typhoon’s high thrust-to-weight ratio and low wing loading allow for rapid acceleration and sharp directional maneuverability, which make it a close-range dogfight killer.

One of the strongest instances was during 2012’s Red Flag exercise in Alaska. German Typhoons were pitted against eight U.S. F-22s in visual-range combat. Maj. Marc Gruene, a German fighter pilot, reported that Typhoons were able to turn around the Raptors on certain instances; they themselves joked that they had “Raptor salad for lunch.” Context is key, however—Typhoons flew light, no external fuel tanks or guns, while Raptors had tanks that reduced their maneuverability, an improbable scenario during real combat.

The F-22s were also said to have registered some kills by U.S. pilots, further showing the complexity of such exercises. Training battles have procedures, safety limitations, and equipment differences that make them not precisely replicate real-world outcomes.

Nevertheless, one of the lessons was: the Raptor’s thrust-vectoring, while potent, can bleed energy. If a pilot pushes too hard in a turn, the F-22 can be vulnerable to “energy fighters” such as the Typhoon, which can carry on speed and re-engage successfully. As one test pilot for the Eurofighter described, not out-turning a Typhoon sets it up to launch a counterattack using its close-range missiles.

All the same, modern air combat is not very much about dogfighting. All the action is long before aircraft are within visual distance. That is the F-22’s advantage. With stealth and cutting-edge radar, it can track and hit from a long distance, sometimes undetected. Equipped with AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles, effective to a range of 75 kilometers, the Raptor can strike before adversaries have time to know it’s there.

The Typhoon’s IRST can detect subsonic targets at over 100 kilometers in ideal circumstances. However, stealth fighters such as the F-22 are far harder to spot using heat seekers, and its advanced electronic warfare package makes it even harder to tag. Conversely, the Raptor’s radar can detect aircraft at around 220 kilometers and engage from 180 kilometers—well beyond the Typhoon’s optimal range.

Technicalities aside, exercises like Red Flag or Arctic Defender serve a number of purposes. NATO pilots utilize them to experiment with tactics, share strategies, and adapt to evolving combat scenarios. According to Col. Kevin Jamieson, commander of the 3rd Wing, exercises of this nature train pilots for high-threat missions where synchronized coordination can be the difference between success and failure.

Finally, the F-22 remains peerless in stealth and beyond-visual-range fighting, while the Eurofighter Typhoon has established itself as a capable and helpful rival in close-in combat. The message is clear: no aircraft can excel at everything. Air supremacy truly comes from maximizing the strengths of an aircraft while exploiting the weaknesses of the adversary.

One could argue that the Martin B-26 Marauder was perhaps the most remarkable case of morphological change and transition within the history of aeronautics. Essentially, the plane went from being a lethally notorious single to one of the most reliable tools of the US armed forces at the end of the war. The story of the aircraft serves as an example of how such changes can be very rapid, even though they could be dangerous and, ultimately, victorious.

The history of the B-26 began in 1939, when the U.S. Army Air Forces issued a specification for a fast, well-armed medium bomber. The Glenn L. Martin Company responded with a design that emphasized speed and aerodynamics above all else.

The result was a streamlined, all-metal monoplane with a short, torpedo-shaped fuselage, tricycle undercarriage, and high wing. In a rare step for the era, the bomber was put directly into production in early 1941—no prototype, no protracted test phase. War was on the horizon, and time to the assembly line was more vital than prudence.

In theory, the Marauder was formidable. Twin Pratt & Whitney R-2800 engines, each producing 2,000 horsepower, provided it with a top speed of around 315 mph. It may be equipped internally to carry 4,000 pounds of bombs, be fitted with .50-caliber machine guns, and fly 1,100 miles on one tank of gas. Subsequent models had up to a dozen guns mounted, making it an undesirable target for enemy aircraft. It also pioneered bomber defense technology by being the first U.S. aircraft equipped with a powered rear turret.

But speed came at a cost. Its small wings resulted in takeoff and landing speeds well above what pilots were accustomed to—frequently between 130 and 150 mph. Green crews had problems, and, compounded by early mechanical issues, crashes began to occur all too often.

In Florida, at MacDill Field, the phrase “One a day in Tampa Bay” was coined as a testimonial to the number of crashes into Tampa Bay. The Marauder soon gained grim nicknames such as “Widowmaker” and “Flying Coffin.” Morale declined, and pilots attempted to switch to other planes.

To remedy the issue permanently, the Army Air Corps hired Colonel Jimmy Doolittle, who demonstrated the B-26 could be safely flown—even on one engine—when properly handled. The Martin Company also introduced crucial design modifications such as a more extended wingspan, an increased vertical stabilizer, and a tougher nose gear.

Pilot training was also revamped to emphasize accurate airspeed control. Slowly but surely, the Marauder’s reputation began to change. By the time it was engaged in prolonged combat, it would go on to have the lowest loss rate of any American bomber in the European Theater.

After its initial teething troubles were past, the B-26 evolved into a capable and reliable medium bomber. It operated in all major theaters of the war—Pacific, Mediterranean, and Europe. First sent to New Guinea, they eventually came to the Mediterranean and European theaters of operations, where they were used to great effectiveness in medium-altitude, short-range bombing sorties, usually under extensive fighter escort.

Marauders were employed in the Italian campaign, in the approach to D-Day, and in the Battle of the Bulge to destroy bridges, lines of supply, and railroad centers. Crews were proud of their accuracy; some missions, such as those over Florence, had succeeded in destroying enemy infrastructure without harming the city’s irreplaceable cultural icons.

When production ceased, over 5,200 Marauders had rolled off the assembly line. They completed over 110,000 combat sorties and saw service not only with the U.S., but also with the Royal Air Force, Free French, and South African Air Force. Even though they were successful in the war effort, they were soon retired following the war. The military felt they were expendable and that most were disposed of as scrap. A few remain today as museum exhibits.

The B-26’s legacy is a blend of hard-learned lessons and intentional respect. It started as a cautionary tale of what can go wrong when innovative design gets ahead of training protocols and support. But it ended as a testament that through sheer determination, intelligent engineering modifications, and experienced pilots, even a problem-slick aircraft can become an exceptional performer. From “Widowmaker” to respected workhorse, the Marauder’s turnaround still ranks among the most dramatic in aviation history.

Today, fighter jets are probably the most complicated and expensive machines that humans have ever created. These technological wonders are not only fast; they also have stealth, can be very lethal, and are equipped with sophisticated high-tech electronics to be able to dominate the sky. Governments worldwide spend such huge sums of money on these machines to be the first in aerial combat and to have the most comprehensive battlefield intelligence. What are the priciest jets? We delve into this question by listing the ten costliest fighter planes in 2024, with the prices ranging from relatively simple stealth models to the most powerful air dominance fighters.

10. FC-31/J-35 – $70 million

The FC-31, also referred to as the J-31 or Gyrfalcon, is a fifth-generation stealth fighter built with versatility in mind. Its shape eludes radar, twin jet engines provide stability, and internal weapons bays make it stay hidden—literally—while its performance remains stunning. A production-ready variant, the J-35, is also being developed, and based on the number of production, the price per aircraft will range between $70 million and $85 million.

9. Boeing F/A-18 Super Hornet – $73 million

The Super Hornet has been the workhorse of carrier flight for decades. Larger and more powerful than its predecessor, the Hornet, it can carry additional payload, fly farther distances, and survive longer missions. The single-seater F/A-18E and two-seater F/A-18F versions usually run between $67 million and $73 million, with the electronic warfare variant, the E/A-18G Growler, topping out at $80 million. It’s a versatile plane that has stood the test of time.

8. Saab JAS 39E/F Gripen – $85 million

Sweden’s Gripen E/F is evidence that a fighter jet doesn’t have to cost the most to perform. Its AESA radar, intelligent onboard systems, and seamless data integration are a combination to fear. Light, simple to maintain, and extremely versatile, it costs about $85 million for either single-seat or two-seat options.

7. Sukhoi Su-35 – $85 million

The Su-35 is an extremely agile air superiority fighter with thrust-vectoring engines that provide it with an advantage in close-range combat. Though not stealthy, it mixes speed, agility, and advanced avionics to stay in the fight. Its average cost is roughly $85 million, with local production tending to cut costs further.

6. Boeing F-15EX Eagle II – $97 million

The F-15EX is the newest iteration of the iconic F-15, able to fly faster than Mach 2.5 and carry over 13 tons of munitions. It’s a “missile truck” in the hands of stealth fighters, providing sheer firepower. Originally estimated at under $80 million, the latest pricing has increased to $97 million. It will replace older variants and fly for decades.

5. Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II – $109 million

The F-35 program is the most ambitious aviation program in history. With three models—a conventional takeoff version, a short-takeoff/vertical landing variant, and a carrier-capable variant—it is unparalleled in stealth, sensors, and battlefield networking. The most costly is the STOVL F-35B, which costs an average of $109 million per aircraft. Throughout its lifespan, costs have increased as requirements changed, but it remains unrivaled in versatility.

4. J-20 – $110 million

This fifth-generation fighter integrates stealth design, internal weapons bays, and high-power engines to retain long-range, high-speed performance. Future developments will introduce added maneuverability and enhanced avionics. Analysts place the per-unit cost at about $110 million, both a reflection of advanced technology and long-term investment in development.

3. Eurofighter Typhoon – $117 million

Built jointly by a number of European countries, the Typhoon is just as comfortable in air-to-air combat or multirole deployments. It has a top speed of over Mach 2, and its thrust-to-weight ratio enables rapid, instantaneous change of direction. Its advanced radar, infrared searchfitting systems, and defensive electronics make it an effective and efficient fighter. Export versions generally have an average price of $117 million.

2. Dassault Rafale – $125 million

The Rafale is an all-around “do-everything” fighter, executing air superiority, strike, reconnaissance, and even nuclear roles. Its delta wings and canard arrangement grant outstanding agility, and its electronic warfare capability guarantees survivability in hostile environments. Each aircraft costs around $125 million, and the model has been very popular with overseas purchasers.

1. Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor – $143 million

The F-22 is still the standard of air superiority. By integrating stealth, supercruise performance, and unmatched maneuverability, it is impossible to see and deadly in battle. Though officially $143 million per aircraft, program costs make the actual price a mere $334 million closer. Few were ever produced, which makes it one of the most elite and proficient fighters ever made.

From multirole agile jets to stealth air superiority hunters, these planes embody the latest in modern flight technology. Countries are willing to spend billions to keep their skies protected—and these jets are the final sign of that dedication.

World War II essentially reshaped the aviation industry, and the technology went far beyond what anyone had anticipated. While different countries were competing to outdo each other and dominate the sky, engineers were simultaneously pushing the boundaries of their designs to gain an advantage over the rival countries. Consequently, the world ended up with some of the weirdest, most surprising, and sometimes even the strangest aircraft that had ever been conceived. The inventions were experimenting with rockets to propel interceptors and flying wings that had never been considered possible or even logical before. These were the ten most surprising and strange aircraft of that time, each being a tale of innovation and the will to dominate.

10. Martin PBM-5A Mariner

The PBM-5A Mariner was a class of America’s patrol bombers, even surpassing the legendary PBY Catalina in several missions. Developed by the Glenn L. Martin Company, it sported gull wings to maintain engines higher than sea spray and retractable wing floats to reduce drag. Its fuselage contained the bomb bay, enabling quicker flight when loaded with heavy bombs. Some models were fitted with jet-assisted take-off rockets, which made them perfect for short, steep rescue climbs. Manned by nine and equipped with several .50-caliber machine guns, the Mariner sank ten German submarines at the Battle of the Atlantic. Of over a thousand produced, just one survives today.

9. Curtiss XP-55 Ascender

The XP-55 Ascender appeared to be straight out of a comic book, with its engine in the back, canard wing up front, and twin vertical tails on wingtips. The “pusher” design was intended to enhance visibility and focus firepower toward the nose. In spite of its radical styling, it had unstable stalls and never achieved the anticipated performance. Three were produced; two crashed, leaving one as a scarce reminder of experimental thought.

8. Vought V-173 “Flying Pancake”

The V-173 got its nickname from its pancake-shaped, round fuselage and enormous propellers, each more than sixteen feet across. Charles Zimmerman designed it. It could take off in a very short distance and nearly hover into a stiff headwind. Its odd shape produced lift on every part of the aircraft, making it as agile as a helicopter in the air. Although its test flights were successful, the Navy had lost interest and was now interested in faster jet aircraft, and the Flying Pancake never entered production.

7. Focke-Wulf 190D “Long Nose”

Nicknamed the “Langnasen” by German airmen, the Focke-Wulf 190D was a high-altitude interceptor with a liquid-cooled Jumo 213 engine. It was capable of speeds approaching 440 mph, making it a good match against Allied bombers. Equipped with 20mm and 13mm cannons, it was a force to be reckoned with, but wartime delays in production prevented it from being produced in numbers sufficient to be decisive. A few exist today in museums.

6. Nakajima Ki-43 Hayabusa (“Oscar”)

The Ki-43 Hayabusa, or Peregrine Falcon, was a long-legged, agile fighter that surprised Allied pilots during the early stages of the war. More than 5,900 were manufactured. Early models did not have armor or self-sealing fuel tanks, but subsequent models addressed these defects while maintaining the aircraft’s legendary maneuverability. Only one fully complete example exists today.

5. Mitsubishi A6M7 Reisen (Zero)

The Mitsubishi Zero was already renowned for its agility and speed, and the A6M7 variant added additional capabilities. Produced for dive-bombing off smaller carriers, it had reinforced wings and bomb racks in place of a centerline fuel tank. More than ten thousand Zeros were produced, although few survive in one piece today, and they are uncommon relics of aviation history.

4. Horten Ho 229

The Ho 229 was a jet-powered flying wing decades ahead of its time. Its streamlined shape cut drag and radar signature, and its double engines promised up to 600 mph. It made its first flight as a prototype in 1944, but the war was over before production could start. It is one of the most advanced and innovative aircraft concepts of the era.

3. Messerschmitt Me 262

The Me 262 was the first operational jet fighter in the world. Capable of a top speed of about 540 mph, with nose-mounted cannons, it could rip apart bomber formations before they even got a chance to respond. Though fuel shortages and unreliability restricted its impact during the war, its design shaped postwar aviation for decades.

2. Heinkel He 178 and He 280

The He 178 was the first jet-powered plane to take to the skies in 1939. It was later followed by the He 280, the first dedicated turbojet fighter, with speeds over 550 mph. Although the Me 262 reached production earlier, these early aircraft marked the onset of a new era in aviation.

1. Mitsubishi J8M1 Shusui / Ki-200

The rocket-plane J8M1 Shusui, based on Germany’s Me 163 Komet, was intended to shoot down high-altitude bombers. It could ascend to tremendous altitudes and achieve blistering velocities in a matter of minutes, but fuel was only good for about five minutes. Japanese technicians hacked out much of its design, and the prototype crashed on its maiden flight, killing the pilot. The war ended before it could be further developed.

These planes show the world-class innovation and bold risks of World War II aviation. Some worked, others didn’t, but all left an indelible mark on the history of flight.