The United States’ latest move to allow Ukraine to fire American-provided ATACMS missiles at targets within Russian borders represents a watershed moment in the conflict. For months, Kyiv had urged Washington to relax restrictions that limited these long-range missiles to occupied Ukrainian territory. Ukraine maintained that these restrictions undermined its capacity to effectively engage in combat. Now that that leash has been lifted, the impact is felt across both the battlefield and diplomatic corridors.
The Army Tactical Missile System, or more commonly referred to as ATACMS, was created in the 1980s by Lockheed Martin to blow up high-priority targets well inside enemy territory. The surface-to-surface ballistic missiles can be fired from Ukraine’s current M270 tracked launcher or M142 HIMARS truck-mounted platform.
At a range of as much as 300 kilometers, they’re the longest-range weapons in Ukraine’s present inventory. ATACMS exist in two main models: one that disperses dozens of bomblets over broad terrain, well-suited for targeting airfields, troops, and air defense; and one that has a 225-kilogram high-explosive warhead, well-suited to destroy hard targets like bunkers and infrastructure.
Washington long held back from allowing Ukraine to use ATACMS against Russian territory, concerned about triggering an escalation that would pull NATO or American forces into direct combat. But the math changed dramatically when North Korean troops started supporting Russian operations in the Kursk pocket, where Ukraine had captured and defended territory. US officials indicate that the policy shift was not only to assist Ukraine in repelling a potential Russian–North Korean counterattack, but also to leave no doubt in Pyongyang that its forces were not out of range of precision strikes.
Timing also had a political purpose. With President-elect Donald Trump about to become president—and publicly doubtful of continued U.S. aid to Ukraine—the Biden administration moved rapidly to provide Kyiv with as much battlefield bargaining power as they could. As the BBC pointed out, making Ukraine’s military position stronger now could mean more effective bargaining in any future peace negotiations.
Ukraine didn’t hesitate to deploy the missiles. The initial reported strike targeted a Russian military facility in Bryansk. Moscow said five of six incoming missiles were intercepted by its air defenses, but the remains of the sixth allegedly ignited a fire at the facility. Ukrainian officials confirmed using ATACMS but did not provide any information, and President Volodymyr Zelensky only said that “the missiles will speak for themselves.”
The immediate effect on the battlefield is evident: Russian commanders are now compelled to move high-value assets such as aircraft, missile systems, and logistics bases further away from the front. This lengthens supply lines and retards air support, bringing fresh operational headaches. As noted by the Atlantic Council, Moscow now has to balance keeping critical assets within reach while protecting them.
The psychological change matters as much. For Ukrainians, both troops and civilians, the capacity to hit as far as Russia is a morale lift at a time when Russian troops have been advancing in the east. For the Kremlin, it’s a reminder that the war can extend a great distance beyond Ukrainian borders. As a countermeasure, President Vladimir Putin has blamed NATO directly and modified Russia’s nuclear policy to reduce the threshold for nuclear use in situations where a non-nuclear state is attacked by a nuclear-armed ally.
Nevertheless, the action is not a sure bet for a decisive turning point. Ukraine has a limited supply of ATACMS because of U.S. stockpile limitations, and Russian forces are already withdrawing vital assets further into the interior. As ex-U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Evelyn Farkas noted, the true test would be how many missiles Ukraine receives—and how well they are utilized.
Long-term American assistance is doubtful. The US military itself is transitioning to the next-generation Precision Strike Missile, with increased range and payload, but not yet committed to Ukraine. With Trump back in the White House, ATACMS shipments and overall assistance prospects are uncertain, particularly as there is a split within his circle between those demanding an early resolution and those willing to continue, but conditionally, with support.
Ukraine’s increased reach has already prodded other Western allies to relax their constraints. Britain and France have licensed the deployment of Storm Shadow and SCALP missiles in strikes within Russia, indicating a wider push toward riskier but more potent assistance.
ATACMS alone won’t decide the war, but their arrival is a powerful symbol of changing Western resolve—and a reminder that modern warfare can shift direction with a single policy decision. What happens next will depend on the choices made in Kyiv, Moscow, and Washington in the weeks ahead.
More related images you may be interested in:
